免费注册 | 网址 | 查询 | 博客 | 培训 | VIP服务 | 电视 | 帮助 | 从零开始 | 教程 | 如何成为本站VIP会员?| 公告
 
 
 位置: 云南外语网 >> 英语 >> 英语阅读 >> 英语报刊阅读 >> 正文
  • 本站域名正式更名为:www.yn10.c...
  • 热门搜索:CET4 CET6 考研
     
    课程推荐
    从零开始学英语 美国街头英语
    德语词汇联想记忆 焦点英语听力区
    托福雅思在线辅导 中外名人演讲区
    空中英语教室系列 倾听科学的声音
    泳辰词汇教程 四六级集中备考
     
    热门文章
     
    推荐文章
     
    相关文章
     
    最新调查
        你需要我们解答什么问题?
    语法方面的问题
    听力方面的问题
    翻译方面的问题
    阅读技巧方面的问题
    写作方面的问题
    英语口语方面的问题

      

     
    爱心广告
     
    爱心广告
    After two major overseas tragedies, Americans are less generous[云南外语网]
    After two major overseas tragedies, Americans are less generous[云南外语网]
    更新时间:2008-5-19 19:27:00    保存本文

    NEW YORK - The numbers are almost too large to fathom, so many stop trying. As bodies pile up in disaster after global disaster, even the most sympathetic souls can turn away.

    Charities know this as "donor fatigue," but it might be more accurately described as disaster fatigue — the sense that these events are never-ending, uncontrollable and overwhelming. Experts say it is one reason Americans have contributed relatively little so far to victims of the Myanmar cyclone and China's earthquake.

    Ironically, the more bad news there is, the less likely people may be to give.

    "Hearing about too many disasters makes some people not give at all, when they would have if it had been just one disaster," says Michal Ann Strahilevitz, who teaches marketing at Golden Gate University and specializes in the factors at play in charitable giving.

    Compared with disasters like the Asian tsunami and Hurricane Katrina, those in China and Myanmar have generated just a trickle of aid. As of Friday, Americans had given about $12.1 million to charities for Myanmar, according to the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. The group said on Monday that it was too soon to count contributions to China.

    Many factors may be to blame
    A number of factors may be at play in the slow American response, including a lack of sympathy for the repressive governments involved, doubts about whether aid will get through, and an inclination to save pennies because of shaky economic times at home.

    But Americans may have also been influenced by the quick succession of monumental catastrophes in two distant lands. At least 130,000 people are dead or missing in the Myanmar cyclone, and the death toll in China's earthquake is expected to surpass 50,000.

    "For the vast number of Americans, if they just gave to some disaster far away and then another disaster happens, in their mind that's clumped as 'faraway disaster,'" Strahilevitz says. "So they will feel, 'I just gave to a faraway disaster.'"

    This problem came up after the 2004 Asian tsunami, an event that brought an avalanche of $1.92 billion in charity from the United States, according to the Giving USA Foundation. Hurricane Katrina eight months later generated even more, $5.3 billion.

    But then fatigue seemed to set in. The earthquake in Pakistan that killed nearly 80,000 people generated just $150 million from Americans. And the Guatemala mudslide shortly thereafter that killed at least 800 was virtually forgotten.

    If one disaster can be galvanizing, several in a row can be paralyzing.

    "It's too much pain, too much tragedy for someone to process, and so we tend to pull ourselves away from it and either close off from it out of psychological defense, or it overwhelms us," says Cynthia Edwards, a professor of psychology at Meredith College in Raleigh, N.C.

    People give closer to home

    [1] [2]  下一页
    点击这里查看该校相关课程信息
     
    相关文章
     
  • 上一篇: Sirens wail in remembrance of those who died in massive earthquake
  • 下一篇:China earthquake: country starts mourning its 50,000 dead
  •  
    特别说明
    用户评论
     
    1. 本站内容多半来自网络,此类文章、试听等资源版权归原作者所有并对此类资源拥有解释权。本站刊登大此类文章仅供个人学习,请勿用作商业用途。
    2. 一般来说,转载自网络的文章都注明了出处,如转载,请注明来源。如若本站转载的文章侵犯了作者的利益,请来信通知本站,本站将在2-3个工作日内删除。
    3. 部分文章为本站原创或编译,版权归本站所有。如转载此类文章,请注明:来自云南外语网。
      网友评论:(只显示最新5条。)